NAMM 2011 最新ニュース
The Audix SCX25A's are nice microphones for a variety of purposes. I've used them a few times for piano and I also tried one of them out for acoustic guitar. I think that two that are at the studio where I used them are a matched pair as you can buy a set of two of them that are matched. For recording piano, I was blown away by the sound of t...
The OM6 also does a pretty good job on drums (not really bass drum), and other loud things like guitar cabs. It uses the same capsule as the SM57, one of the best mics for guitar cabs. I've given other microphones in the same price range, (and even some that are pricier) an honest test drive, but I just keep coming back to my OM6....
What is especially fantastic about the Audix D3 is the fact that the microphone is so good at micing up a guitar amp. The fact that this microphone can handle both high frequency capture and enormous amounts of SPL, combined with the response that boosts low mids and presence peaks at transition points between frequency classification ranges at ...
In use, the Audix f5 honestly seemed quite useful, and I could see people using these to multi mic many different things. I would not be opposed to substituting these for SM57s. However, the SM57 is, in comparison to the f5, extremely cutting and robust sounding, as opposed to the almost forced natural sound of the f5. While the SM57s were not q...
In use, I have found that the Audix f6 is exactly what Audix says it is. It seems that the cheaper microphones from Audix are not just less quality version of the more expensive types, but quite honestly just different flavors. I can, however, imagine how the D6 would be easier to work with than the f6. However, one should never go into a microp...
When I tested the D1, I was a huge fan of how unobtrusive the microphone sounded, especially against Audix's tendency to create overly specific thunder microphones that just explode and often oversaturate. The sound of the Audix D1 is by no means at all dead. In fact, it is quite lively and sweet sounding, and Audix even says it could be used fo...
Now I am not a harmonica player, but I have tried to do so with this particular microphone. I was actually surprised to find such a specialty microphone in a store, but I have a little harmonica that I enjoy to mess around with, so I thought: why not give it a try? I've heard the Green Bullet before, and the Fireball V is a much cleaner, smoothe...
Audix's advertising of this microphone as having that explosive sound is a great way for anyone to get an idea of this microphone. Usually, sensation advertisement should be taken with quite a bit of salt, but in the case of the Audix f2, everything that Audix says is true. The frequency response of this microphone is extremely specially spiky, ...
At $219, the OM6 is just a bit cheaper than the for all intents and purposes flat workhorse OM7, and what microphone you choose is up to you. However, keep in mind that the OM6 is not terribly colored; it just has that slight rise that tightens up a sound in a voice. I find that between the two, the OM7 can be tweaked in EQ to sound roughly like...
I think that the problem of the OM3 lies in the fact that I personally do not understand where it fits in the market. It is a flatter version of the OM2, which puts it closer to the OM7, but it includes the slight vocal presence in the middle, making it a slightly more tapered version of the OM7. I do not dislike it, I just do not quite understa...
